Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Anti-Vibrational Rubber Parts - Dealership Actions
Case Number:
2:13-cv-00802
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Barrett Law Group
- Burns Charest
- Cozen O'Connor
- Crowell & Moring
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Freed Kanner
- Gibson Dunn
- Harken Law Firm
- Hertz Schram
- Juckniess Law Firm
- Kakinuki Law Office
- Katten Muchin
- Kerr Russell
- Kohn Swift
- Larson King
- Mantese Honigman
- Matthew G. Miller PC
- McAlpine PC
- Morgan Lewis
- Neal & Harwell
- Preti Flaherty
- Robins Kaplan
- Seyburn Kahn
- Sidley Austin
- Spector Roseman
- Steven Williams Law
- Susman Godfrey
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 17, 2021
6th Circ. Says Auto Parts Buyers Can't Bring Price-Fixing Suit
The Sixth Circuit reversed a Michigan federal court decision that kept alive claims in a putative class action alleging price-fixing for rubber parts used to reduce engine and road vibration, ruling that classwide settlements with all end-payor purchasers in the broader multidistrict litigation bar this purported direct-purchaser case from going forward.
-
October 01, 2020
Car Dealers Cut Out Of Settlement Rounds In Auto Part MDL
A Michigan federal judge has denied a bid from 35 car dealerships to get payouts from the first two settlement rounds of sprawling multidistrict litigation over an alleged price-fixing scheme for certain rubber auto parts, ruling Thursday the dealerships missed the filing deadlines.
-
November 15, 2017
Bridgestone's $9.4M Price-Fixing Deal Gets Initial OK
A Michigan federal judge on Tuesday gave her initial approval to a $9.36 million settlement between Bridgestone Corp. and a putative class of car dealerships, which claim the tire maker took part in a price-fixing scheme for rubber parts that reduce engine and road vibration.
-
October 18, 2017
Bridgestone To Pay $9M To Exit Auto Parts Price-Fixing Suit
Tire maker Bridgestone Corp. has agreed to pay $9.36 million to settle claims in multidistrict litigation over an alleged price-fixing scheme for certain rubber parts, the company said Tuesday in Michigan federal court.
-
October 12, 2017
Toyo To Pay $11.4M To End Auto Parts Price-Fixing Suit
Toyo Tire & Rubber Co. Ltd. will pay $11.4 million to settle automobile dealers' claims in multidistrict litigation alleging it colluded with automotive manufacturers, marketers and sellers to fix prices for certain rubber parts, according to a Michigan federal court filing Thursday.