Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Braden Partners, LP et al v. Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Case Number:
3:14-cv-01689
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
October 21, 2016
Medical Co. Never Bought Duty To Defend, Insurer Says
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. urged a California federal judge not to grant summary judgment to policyholder Braden Partners LP in a coverage suit over an underlying whistleblower False Claims Act suit, saying Braden never bought duty-to-defend coverage and can't be reimbursed for $3 million.
-
March 18, 2016
Insurer Wants Coverage Row Halted Until FCA Suit Ends
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. asked a California federal judge Friday to pause a coverage suit its facing from a medical equipment company fighting a whistleblower's False Claims Act suit until after the underlying litigation has been resolved.
-
April 06, 2015
Twin City Needn't Cover Medical Co.'s FCA Suit, Judge Says
Twin City Fire Insurance Co. doesn't have to cover a medical equipment company's defense costs in connection with a whistleblower suit alleging violations of the False Claims Act, a California federal judge ruled Friday, saying the insurer's obligations haven't been triggered because the complaint hasn't been served on the policyholder.