Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Signal IP, Inc. v. Subaru of America, Inc.
Case Number:
2:14-cv-02963
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 03, 2015
Signal Patent Claims Ruled Invalid In Spat With Automakers
A California federal judge on Monday found a pair of claims invalid in one of Signal IP Inc.'s car-safety patents asserted against Nissan, Mazda and Subaru, saying certain confusing terms make the scope of the invention unclear.
-
July 21, 2015
Signal IP Says Automakers Can't Invalidate Car Safety Patent
Signal IP Inc. fired back Monday against Nissan North America Inc., Mazda Motor of America Inc. and Subaru of America Inc.'s attempt to trim a suit accusing the automakers of infringing its car safety patents, arguing that a person familiar with the technology would understand a term used in a Signal patent.