Kinglite Holdings Inc. v. Micro-Star International Co Ltd. et al

  1. September 01, 2016

    Kinglite To Pay $1.5M In Atty Fees In 'Exceptional' IP Suit

    A California federal judge on Wednesday ordered Singapore-based Kinglite to pay $1.5 million in attorneys' fees for the first part of its patent infringement case against computer hardware companies after recently finding the dismissed claims to be so meritless as to be "exceptional."

  2. July 08, 2016

    Enfish Doesn't Save Kinglite Computer IP Claims, Judge Rules

    A California federal judge has refused to reconsider a holding that Singapore-based Kinglite Holdings Inc.'s patent on computer authentication technology was invalid, saying the high-profile Enfish case, which reversed an Alice invalidation and held that software patents are not invalid if they claim improvements in computer technology, didn't apply.

  3. June 28, 2016

    IP Row's 1st Phase Deemed 'Exceptional,' Judge Orders Fees

    A California federal judge has determined that Singapore-based Kinglite must pay attorneys' fees for the prevailing side in the first part of a patent infringement case, deeming the plaintiff showed "exceptional" conduct and lacked sufficient arguments — even though the lawsuit has not yet concluded.

  4. October 21, 2015

    Kinglite's Computer Patent Claims Nixed Under Alice

    A California federal judge has struck down Kinglite's authentication patent that it had asserted against various technology manufacturers, saying it couldn't stand in the face of scrutiny from the framework established in the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!