Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
CryoLife Inc. v. Medafor Inc.
Case Number:
1:14-cv-00559
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 02, 2015
CryoLife Appeals Rare Injunction In Patent Case
CryoLife Inc. on Wednesday filed its notice of appeal to the Federal Circuit of a preliminary injunction barring its PerClot blood-clotting powder, one day after a Delaware federal judge ordered Medafor Inc. to pay CryoLife $100,000 in the event that any court finds the injunction was wrongly issued.
-
March 11, 2015
Judge Issues Rare Injunction In CR Bard Unit's Patent Case
A Delaware federal judge on Tuesday barred sales of CryoLife Inc.'s PerClot blood-clotting powder after finding that C.R. Bard Inc. unit Medafor Inc. had shown that the product likely infringes its patent, in a relatively rare instance of a judge granting a preliminary injunction in a patent case.