Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Finjan, Inc. v. Blue Coat Systems, Inc.

  1. January 10, 2018

    Fed. Circ. Ruling Prompts Mistrial In Symantec Unit IP Case

    A California federal judge on Wednesday granted Symantec unit Blue Coat's request for a mistrial in a cybersecurity patent infringement case brought by Finjan, saying a just-issued Federal Circuit decision striking damages in a related case called for a fresh jury, free from certain impressions about damages and willfulness issues.

  2. July 19, 2016

    $39M Finjan Patent Win Stands, But Judge Won't Enhance It

    A federal judge on Monday rejected Blue Coat Systems Inc.'s bid to toss a $39.5 million verdict against it in a cybersecurity patent suit by Finjan Inc., but also denied Finjan's request for enhanced damages and attorneys' fees under recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings.

  3. January 04, 2016

    'Baffled' Judge Chides Finjan, Blue Coat Over Page Limits

    A California federal judge reprimanded attorneys for both cybersecurity firm Finjan Inc. and rival Blue Coat Systems Inc. in a $39 million patent dispute for each disobeying the court's page limit requirements as they fought over attorneys' fees, saying that she was "baffled" as to how neither side could adhere to the court's rules.

  4. December 07, 2015

    Finjan Seeks Atty Fees After Winning $39M Patent Verdict

    Cybersecurity firm Finjan Inc. told a California federal court Friday it should be awarded legal fees after winning more than $39 million in a patent dispute with Blue Coat Systems Inc., arguing its rival's defenses in the case were "frivolous and incoherent."

  5. November 24, 2015

    Alice Doesn't Disturb $39M Finjan IP Verdict, Judge Says

    A California federal judge has let stand a jury's $39 million verdict awarded to Finjan Inc. over Internet security patents it asserted against Blue Coat Systems Inc., saying in part that the patent that yielded the bulk of the jury's damages award is not abstract under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice framework.

  6. August 28, 2015

    Finjan Rejects Blue Coat's Alice Argument In $39M Case

    Finjan Inc. urged a California federal court Thursday to deny Blue Coat System Inc.'s bid to invalidate one of its Internet security patents under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling to trim the $39 million verdict Finjan won, saying the claims are patent eligible under the precedential decision.

  7. August 21, 2015

    Blue Coat Cites Alice, Laches In Bid To Cut $39M IP Verdict

    Blue Coat Systems Inc. on Thursday sought to erode a portion of a $39 million verdict awarded to Finjan Inc. over Internet security patents, arguing that at least one of the patents is invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling and the suit was filed too late.

  8. August 05, 2015

    Jury Puts Blue Coat On Hook For $39M In Finjan IP Suit

    A California federal jury on Tuesday found that Blue Coat Systems Inc. infringed five patents held by Finjan Inc. covering Internet security technology and awarded the cybersecurity company $39.5 million in damages.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!