Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Riva et al v. Pepsico, Inc.
Case Number:
3:14-cv-02020
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
March 04, 2015
Pepsi Escapes Cancer-Warning Class Action
A California judge on Wednesday dismissed with prejudice a proposed class action that sought to compel PepsiCo Inc. to provide medical monitoring to consumers after failing to warn them that a chemical in its drinks is linked to a form of lung cancer, ruling that the plaintiffs' causation and injury allegations aren't factually supported.
-
January 15, 2015
Pepsi Drinkers' Cancer-Warning Class Action In Jeopardy
A California federal judge cast doubt Thursday on a proposed class action seeking to force PepsiCo Inc. to provide medical monitoring to consumers after failing to warn them that its drinks contain a chemical linked to bronchioloalveolar cancer, saying the plaintiffs haven't offered evidence the chemical causes cancer in humans.