Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Bowling v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-03727
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 04, 2014
J&J Wins Dismissal Of Listerine False Labeling Suit
A New York federal judge has granted Johnson & Johnson's motion to dismiss a putative class action lawsuit accusing it of using false and misleading labeling to market Listerine mouthwash, saying the claims are preempted by the Food Drug and Cosmetics Act.
-
May 27, 2014
J&J Hit With Class Action Over Listerine False Labels
A consumer hit Johnson & Johnson and subsidiaries with a proposed class action in New York federal court on Tuesday, accusing the defendants of falsely labeling Listerine Total Care products for enamel restoration despite the "overwhelming consensus" of experts that lost tooth enamel is permanent.