Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Perez v. Higher One Holdings, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:14-cv-00755
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 13, 2018
Higher One Shareholders Seek Final OK On $7.5M Settlement
A class of Higher One Holdings Inc. investors on Tuesday asked a Connecticut federal judge to approve a $7.5 million deal with the company and its former board members, settling allegations the higher education financial services provider misled the investors following a run-in with federal regulators.
-
September 25, 2017
Investor Suit Against Higher One To Proceed Largely Intact
A Connecticut federal judge on Monday found that the investors accusing Higher One Holdings Inc. of having misled them about being back on the straight and narrow after a run-in with federal regulators have tightened up their complaint enough for the bulk of their proposed class action against the higher education financial services provider to proceed.
-
September 15, 2016
Higher One Escapes Shareholder Suit Over Compliance
A Connecticut federal judge has tossed a proposed shareholder class action alleging that Higher One Holdings Inc. and its board members misled investors about the educational financial services provider's revised legal compliance system, saying the investors couldn't show that the company didn't actually improve the system.