Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Bayol v. Zipcar, Inc.
Case Number:
3:14-cv-02483
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 20, 2015
Zipcar Can't Shake Calif. Drivers' Late Fee Suit
A group of California drivers accusing Zipcar Inc. of illegally gouging them on late fees beat the car-sharing company's bid to dismiss the suit after a California federal judge ruled that the plaintiffs showed they could recover more than the $5 million federal threshold.
-
August 10, 2015
Zipcar Says Late Fee Suit Doesn't Meet $5M Threshold
Zipcar Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to toss a proposed class action accusing it of illegally gouging California drivers on late fees, arguing that the plaintiffs have no evidence that the amount at issue in their case exceeds the $5 million federal threshold.
-
January 30, 2015
Zipcar Can't Ditch Claims It Gouged Drivers On Late Fees
A California federal judge Thursday denied Zipcar Inc.'s request to throw out a putative class action accusing it of illegally gouging California drivers on late fees, saying the car-sharing service must show how the charges square with the actual cost of overdue vehicle returns.
-
September 26, 2014
Zipcar Can't Move Calif. Late Fee Suit To Mass., Judge Says
A California federal judge on Friday nixed Zipcar Inc.'s bid to transfer a putative class action alleging it unfairly gouges customers on late fees, saying a clause in the membership agreement stipulating that all legal actions be brought in Massachusetts court might affect the California state law claims in the suit.
-
May 30, 2014
Zipcar Customer Sues To Recover 'Unconscionable' Late Fees
A Zipcar Inc. customer launched a putative class action Thursday in California claiming the car-sharing service unfairly gouges customers on late fees, saying the charges don't square with the cost of overdue vehicle returns and can't be enforced under state law.