Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Imperium IP Holdings (Cayman), Ltd. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number:
4:14-cv-00371
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Desmarais LLP
- Fisch Sigler
- McCathern Shokouhi
- Nixon Peabody
- Potter Minton
- Ropes & Gray
- Siebman Law
- Sughrue Mion
- Tensegrity Law
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 14, 2017
Samsung Hit With Beefed-Up Ongoing Royalty In Patent Suit
A Texas federal judge rebuked Samsung on Wednesday for continuing to infringe two patents after a 2016 trial, and also awarded a higher-than-verdict ongoing royalty, but refrained from granting winner Imperium's $6.95 million fee request until more documentation is submitted to the court.
-
April 27, 2017
Enhanced Damages Stay In $19.2M Samsung Patent Ruling
A Texas federal judge Thursday found a new Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling was not grounds to cancel an enhanced damages award against Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. in a patent suit brought by an intellectual property firm.
-
January 06, 2017
Samsung Can't Fight Treble Damages, Patent Co. Says
A Texas federal court has no reason to disturb an enhanced-damages award against Samsung Electronic Co. Ltd., an intellectual property firm claimed Friday, saying a jury's roughly $7 million verdict against Samsung was rightly multiplied to $20.7 million for knowingly infringing two imaging patents.
-
October 12, 2016
Samsung Says Jury Was Right To Invalidate Imaging Patent
Samsung urged a Texas federal judge to uphold part of a verdict finding one of an intellectual property firm's imaging patents invalid, arguing Tuesday that the firm failed to offer relevant expert testimony at trial to prove the patent was not invalid as obvious.
-
August 25, 2016
Samsung 'Willful' Infringement Verdict Enhanced To $20.9M
A Texas federal judge on Wednesday tripled a jury's roughly $7 million verdict against Samsung for knowingly infringing two imaging patents with its devices, finding that the violations were indeed willful and warranted enhancement.
-
March 29, 2016
Samsung Can't Amend Validity Arguments In $7M Patent Row
A Texas federal judge rejected Samsung's bid to amend its arguments challenging the validity of two imaging patents Monday, nearly two months after the electronics maker was hit with a $7 million jury verdict for infringing some of the patents' claims.
-
February 09, 2016
Samsung Hit With $7M Jury Verdict In Imaging Patent Row
Samsung was hit with a nearly $7 million verdict by a Texas federal jury on Monday that found the smartphone giant willfully infringed at least some claims in a nonpracticing entity's two imaging patents with its devices.