Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY et al v. BECTON DICKINSON AND COMPANY
Case Number:
2:14-cv-04410
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 13, 2018
Travelers, Becton Strike Settlement In $167M Coverage Row
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. and Becton Dickinson and Co. told a New Jersey federal court on Wednesday that they have reached a settlement in a dispute over defense costs and $167 million in settlement payments in antitrust class actions.
-
July 13, 2016
Travelers Denied Reconsideration Bid In $167M Coverage Row
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday declined to reconsider his previous decision that denied Travelers an immediate ruling on whether it owes Becton Dickinson coverage of $167 million in settlement payments in antitrust litigation, saying the insurer's disagreement simply wouldn't cut it.
-
July 08, 2016
Becton Says New Evidence Justifies $167M Travelers Row
Medical supply company Becton-Dickinson and Co. said Friday that information newly revealed by insurer Travelers proves that a New Jersey federal judge was right to deny Travelers' bid for quick judgment in a suit seeking coverage for $167 million in antitrust class action settlements — even as Travelers says the information is irrelevant.
-
April 05, 2016
Travelers Denied Win In Row Over Becton's $167M In Deals
A New Jersey federal judge on Tuesday declined to rule that Travelers doesn't have to cover Becton Dickinson and Co.'s defense costs and $167 million in settlement payments in antitrust class actions, finding that there are still questions as to whether BD's alleged late notice of the underlying suits prejudiced the insurer.
-
July 14, 2014
Travelers Denies Coverage For Med Co.'s $67M Settlements
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. filed suit in New Jersey federal court seeking an order that it does not have to cover medical technology company Becton Dickinson and Co.'s defense costs and $67 million in settlement payments in underlying antitrust class actions.