Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Technology Properties Limited, LLC v. Canon, Inc. et al
Case Number:
4:14-cv-03640
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Amin Turocy
- Brunetti Rougeau
- Bunsow De Mory
- Chen IP Law Group
- Dacus Law Firm
- Fenwick & West
- Findlay Craft
- Fish & Richardson
- Goodwin Procter
- Jones Day
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Law Offices of S.J. Christine Yang
- Love Law Firm PC
- LTL Attorneys
- Ramey & Flock
- Silicon Valley Law Group
- Webb Law Firm
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 12, 2017
Canon Gets $1.8M In Attys' Fees In Memory Card IP Row
A California federal judge on Wednesday ordered the holders of two flash memory card reader patents to pay nearly $1.8 million in attorneys' fees to Canon when the entities persisted in their infringement case, even after the U.S. International Trade Commission cleared the imaging company of similar allegations.
-
January 26, 2017
Canon Gets Fees In 'Exceptionally Weak' Memory IP Case
Canon Inc. won a bid for attorneys' fees Thursday when a California federal judge found two flash memory card reader patent-holders' persistence in their case even after a U.S. International Trade Commission decision found Canon didn't infringe was exceptional under the high court's Octane Fitness standard.
-
September 16, 2016
Canon Beats Flash Memory Patent Infringement Suit
Canon beat a memory card reader patent infringement suit filed by Technology Properties when a California federal judge agreed Friday with the Japanese imaging company that the accused products do not infringe the asserted patents.
-
August 30, 2016
Canon Tries To Ditch Flash Memory Patent Case
Canon Inc. asked a California federal judge to toss Technology Properties Ltd. LLC's memory card reader patent infringement case, arguing at a hearing Tuesday that its products don't contain the technology described in the court's claim limitations and that prior art would render TPL's broad interpretation of those claims invalid.