May 03, 2016
The maker of the 6-Hour Power energy shot continued its bid to overturn a $10.6 million trademark infringement verdict in favor of 5-Hour Energy’s maker, telling a Michigan federal judge the trial evidence overwhelmingly supported what should have been a false advertising verdict in its favor instead. Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to the previous verdict as a patent infringement verdict. The error has been corrected.
April 19, 2016
The maker of 5-Hour Energy on Monday urged a Michigan federal judge to uphold a $10.6 million trademark infringement verdict against a rival, which has asked for instant judgment or a new trial on its false advertising counterclaims, saying the motions simply rehashed old rejected arguments. Correction: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to the previous verdict as a patent infringement verdict. The error has been corrected.
March 28, 2016
An energy supplement maker, hit last month with a $10.6 million verdict in a rival's trademark infringement suit, asked a Michigan federal court on Friday for a new trial on its false advertising counterclaim, saying that opposing counsel's improper arguments almost certainly swayed the jury.
February 26, 2016
A Michigan federal jury awarded the maker of 5-Hour Energy a $10.6 million verdict in its trademark infringement suit against a rival that was selling a "six-hour" product, ending a suit that went on for eight years and saw one judge die of cancer and another get shot in Detroit.