Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
ALLIANCE HOLDINGS, INC. et al v. SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP.
Case Number:
2:14-cv-05780
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 12, 2015
Squire Patton, Alliance Drop Suit Over Founder's Scheme
Private equity firm Alliance Holdings Inc. and Squire Patton Boggs LLP agreed Wednesday to drop a suit claiming the law firm represented clients with conflicting interests and colluded with its founder to funnel millions to himself and associates while earning $7 million in legal fees.
-
February 11, 2015
Squire Patton Boggs Should Face ERISA Claims, Alliance Says
The trustee for Pennsylvania employee-owned private equity firm Alliance Holdings Inc. on Tuesday sought to hold Squire Patton Boggs LLP liable for allegedly aiding the company's founder in a fraud scheme, arguing that the firm should be considered a fiduciary to company employees under federal law.
-
October 14, 2014
Squire Patton Accused Of Guiding Alliance Founder's Scheme
The trustee for Pennsylvania employee-owned private equity firm Alliance Holdings Inc. has accused Squire Patton Boggs LLP in federal court of representing Alliance and clients with conflicting interests and aiding its founder in funneling tens of millions dollars to himself and associates, all while it netted $7 million in legal fees.