Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Garrison v. Oracle Corporation
Case Number:
5:14-cv-04592
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Cohelan Khoury
- Donahue Fitzgerald
- Hausfeld LLP
- Hogue & Belong
- Jones Day
- Latham & Watkins
- Mayer Brown
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 03, 2016
Oracle Again Ducks Suit Over No-Poaching Plot With Google
U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh on Tuesday again tossed a proposed class action in California federal court alleging Oracle Corp. conspired with Google Inc. and others to suppress employee pay through anti-poaching agreements with other technology companies.
-
July 22, 2015
Poaching Suit Against Oracle Still Has Standing, Class Says
A putative class of former Oracle Corp. employees urged a California district court on Monday to deny the company's motion to dismiss their second amended complaint, which alleges that Oracle conspired to suppress employee pay through anti-poaching agreements with other technology companies.
-
April 23, 2015
Oracle Nixes Late Suit Over No-Poaching Plot With Google
A California federal judge on Wednesday tossed a former Oracle employee's putative class action alleging the company conspired to suppress employee pay through an anti-poaching agreement with Google Inc., saying the worker filed the antitrust suit too late.
-
January 06, 2015
Oracle Says No-Poach Class Action Based On Flimsy Evidence
Oracle Corp. urged a California federal judge on Monday to grant it a quick victory in a proposed class action accusing it of conspiring to suppress employee pay through an anti-poaching agreement with Google Inc., arguing that the case is based on an outdated document.
-
October 23, 2014
Judge Koh Agrees To Take On Oracle Anti-Poaching Suit
U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh agreed Wednesday to take on a proposed class action accusing Oracle Corp. of conspiring to suppress employee pay by entering an anti-poaching agreement with Google Inc., finding the new suit was related to an ongoing case about similar recruitment agreements.
-
October 15, 2014
Oracle Hit With Anti-Poach Suit Over Deal With Google
Oracle Corp., Google Inc. and others illegally agreed not to poach each other's managers, a former Oracle employee said Tuesday in a putative class action filed in California against his former company, citing a document from engineers' antitrust suit against Google, Apple Inc. and other tech giants.