Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Farar et al v. Bayer AG et al
Case Number:
3:14-cv-04601
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Carter Arnett
- Donahue Fitzgerald
- Kaplan Fox
- Shook Hardy
- Sidley Austin
- Stanley Law Group
- Wilkinson Stekloff
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 26, 2019
Bayer Beats Certified Class In $600M Vitamin Labeling Row
A California federal jury has cleared Bayer AG of allegations that its One A Day multivitamins' labels cost three certified classes of consumers $600 million, finding label statements that the vitamins support heart health, immunity and physical energy are not false or misleading.
-
November 16, 2017
Consumers Get State Classes Certified In Bayer Vitamin Row
A California federal judge on Wednesday certified several state classes of consumers in litigation challenging the labeling of Bayer AG's One A Day vitamins, but found that the shoppers leading the suit didn't meet the burden for a nationwide class in an order that also rejected the company's quick win bid.
-
October 18, 2017
Bayer Seeks To End One-A-Day Labeling Class Action
Bayer asked a California federal judge Wednesday to toss a putative class action over the labeling of Bayer AG's One-A-Day vitamins, saying that the whole case rested on the contention the pills had no value, but that he'd gotten the plaintiffs' own expert to admit the vitamin "is not worthless."
-
January 12, 2017
Atty Misconduct Not 'Egregious,' Judge Finds In Bayer Suit
A California federal judge overseeing a false-labeling class action over Bayer AG's One-A-Day vitamins declined Wednesday to intervene in a discovery dispute about alleged defense production delays and accusations that Bayer's lead counsel engaged in witness-coaching.
-
August 19, 2015
Bayer Can't Escape One-A-Day Labeling Class Action
A California federal judge on Tuesday kept alive a class action over the labeling of Bayer AG's One-A-Day vitamins, finding its "supporting heart health and immunity" claims to be "structure/function claims" that are not preempted because plaintiffs had provided sufficient evidence to show they were plausibly misleading.
-
May 04, 2015
Bayer Wants Out Of One-A-Day Labeling Class Action
Bayer AG told a California federal court Monday that it should toss a proposed class action against it over the labeling on its One-A-Day vitamins, arguing that the plaintiffs had not shown that it had made any impermissible "disease-prevention" claims on the products.
-
March 11, 2015
Class Action Over Bayer's One-A-Day Labeling Survives
A California federal judge on Tuesday rejected some claims by a putative class that Bayer AG's labeling on its One-A-Day vitamins lies to customers about the product's benefits, killing the class's claims about heart and immune health but keeping alive claims about physical energy.