Scat Enterprises, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC

  1. June 12, 2017

    Fiat Chrysler Not Liable For Damages In 'Scat Pack' Fight

    An aftermarket auto parts supplier isn't entitled to any monetary damages in its dispute with Fiat Chrysler over the automaker's use of the term "Scat Pack" for some of its own parts, a California federal judge said Thursday, finding that the supplier didn't show Fiat willfully infringed its trademark or devalued its product.

  2. February 16, 2017

    Chrysler, Auto Parts Co. Want Quick Wins In 'Scat Pack' Suit

    Chrysler on Tuesday asked a California federal judge for summary judgment that it didn't infringe an auto parts supplier's trademark by using the term "Scat Pack" for parts and accessories, and the supplier separately asked the court to rule against counterclaims that it abandoned the trademark.

  3. November 25, 2014

    Chrysler Slams Decades-Old 'Scat Pack' Mark Spat

    Chrysler Group LLC fired back at a suit accusing it of infringing an auto parts supplier's trademark by using the term "Scat Pack" for parts and accessories, telling a California federal judge that consumers wouldn't confuse its iconic Scat automotive parts with parts produced by a small company.

  4. October 16, 2014

    Chrysler Sued For Reviving Decades-Old Trademark Detente

    More than 40 years after last using the term "Scat Pack" for parts and accessories, Chrysler Group LLC has once again adopted the contested trademark, according to an auto parts company's lawsuit filed in California federal court on Wednesday accusing Chrysler of confusing industry insiders.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!