Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
NATIONAL COLLEGIATE ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION et al v. CHRISTIE et al
Case Number:
3:14-cv-06450
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
- Major League Baseball Inc.
- National Basketball Association Inc.
- National Collegiate Athletic Association
- National Hockey League
- NFL Enterprises LLC
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 12, 2021
NJ Track Operator Drops Bid For $150M In Sports Betting Row
A New Jersey racetrack operator has reached an agreement with the NCAA and other sports leagues to drop a dispute over a $3.4 million bond and $150 million in damages stemming from the landmark case that made sports betting legal.
-
December 04, 2020
NJ Racetrack Loses 'Bad Faith' Bid In Sports Betting Suit
A New Jersey federal judge has denied a racetrack's bid to collect immediate payment on a $3.4 million bond that major sports leagues posted when they sued to stop sports betting in the state, saying it failed to properly claim the leagues acted in "bad faith" when they halted gambling.
-
June 16, 2020
Leagues Say Purported Sports Betting Hypocrisy Old News
The major professional sports leagues and the NCAA urged a New Jersey federal court to toss a bid for $150 million in damages from a horse racetrack that was prevented from offering sports betting after the leagues sued to stop New Jersey from legalizing the activity, arguing that the leagues' purported "hypocrisy" in promoting fantasy sports at the same time has already been rejected.
-
June 28, 2019
5 Sports & Betting Cases To Watch: Midyear Report
Following a big win at the U.S. Supreme Court last year, the New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen's Association is now seeking $150 million in damages from the NCAA and major professional sports leagues for their litigation that delayed legal sports betting in the state for years. Here, Law360 takes a look at that suit and four other sports and betting cases attorneys should keep an eye on in the second half of 2019.
-
November 19, 2018
NJ Racetrack Denied $3.4M Bond After Sports Betting Fight
A New Jersey federal judge has denied a racetrack's attempt to force four professional sports leagues and the NCAA to pay $3.4 million plus interest for launching litigation that stopped the track from taking sports bets until a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, saying the track wasn't wrongfully blocked.
-
May 31, 2018
Leagues Fight Racetrack's Fee Bid After Sports Betting Ruling
Four professional sports leagues and the NCAA told a New Jersey federal court they shouldn't owe a racetrack $3.4 million plus interest for launching yearslong litigation that blocked it from taking sports bets until a recent U.S Supreme Court decision, saying the temporary restraining order was warranted.
-
May 25, 2018
NJ Racetrack Wants $3.4M Bond After Sports Betting Win
A New Jersey racetrack urged a federal court to order four professional sports leagues and the NCAA to pay $3.4 million plus interest for launching yearslong litigation that blocked it from taking sports bets until a recent U.S Supreme Court decision, estimating the injunction cost it almost $150 million in lost revenue.
-
November 23, 2014
NJ Vows To Appeal After Sports Betting Blocked Again
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie again lost a bid to allow sports gambling in the state's casinos and racetracks when a federal judge on Friday granted the National Football League and other sports leagues a permanent injunction on a sports betting law, but the state plans to appeal.
-
November 20, 2014
NFL Drives To Lock Down NJ Sports Betting Injunction
The National Football League and other professional sports leagues asked a federal judge on Thursday for a preliminary injunction against sports betting at New Jersey's casinos and racetracks, calling the state's selective repeal of gambling laws a blatant attempt to circumvent a Third Circuit ruling.
-
November 19, 2014
3rd Circ. Is True Test For NJ's Sports Betting Plans
The odds are New Jersey won't be able to overcome an effort by sports leagues Thursday to block legalized sports gambling in the Garden State, but the true test of whether the plan clashes with federal law won't come until the dispute goes back up to the Third Circuit, attorneys say.