Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Epstein v. Epstein et al
Case Number:
1:14-cv-08431
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
January 30, 2018
Atty Who Sent Ill. Judge Angry Emails Suspended From Court
An Illinois attorney has been sanctioned for sending angry emails to a judge over "fraudulent" orders that filled her "with anger and disgust," while representing a husband against his ex-wife in a bitter, yearslong legal battle.
-
August 03, 2017
Couple Settles Wiretap Act Suit Over Email Snooping
An Illinois federal jury won't get to debate whether a wife's alleged use of an auto-forwarding rule to snoop in her husband's email constitutes a violation of the Wiretap Act, as the now-divorced couple settled their suit Wednesday.
-
August 01, 2017
Wife Violated Wiretap Act With Email Snooping, Jury Told
A wife who allegedly read her husband's email for years violated the federal Wiretap Act while trying to gain leverage over him during their divorce, counsel for the husband told an Illinois federal jury Tuesday.