Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation et al
Case Number:
4:10-cv-03098
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bhs Law LLP
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Polk
- Dewey & LeBoeuf
- Hanson Bridgett
- Latham & Watkins
- Paul Weiss
- Quinn Emanuel
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 07, 2019
Samsung Beats Panasonic's Sanctions Bid For $8M In Fees
A California federal judge found that some allegations in Samsung's suit alleging Panasonic colluded with others to monopolize the flash memory card market were misleading and made in bad faith but declined Panasonic's bid for sanctions in the form of $8.15 million in attorneys' fees and costs.
-
May 16, 2018
Samsung Fights Sanctions Bid In Panasonic Antitrust Suit
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. urged a California federal court on Tuesday not to sanction the company over its suit alleging Panasonic Corp. colluded with others to monopolize the flash memory card market, arguing Panasonic is glossing over the main part of the alleged scheme.
-
April 18, 2018
Panasonic Wants Samsung Sanctioned In Antitrust Suit
Panasonic Corp. asked a California federal court on Tuesday to sanction Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. over a suit alleging Panasonic monopolized the flash memory card market, arguing that Samsung initiated and maintained the eight-year-old litigation in bad faith.
-
October 03, 2017
Tribunal Asked For Clarity In Samsung Licensing Row
A California federal judge on Monday sought clarification from an international tribunal as to whether, under its May award, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. can seek damages for Panasonic Corp.'s alleged scheme to monopolize the flash memory card market after a related licensing agreement between Samsung and Toshiba Corp. entered into effect.