Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Edible Arrangements International, LLC et al v. 1-800-Flowers.com, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:14-cv-01744
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 01, 2016
Edible Arrangements, 1-800-Flowers End Sprawling TM Fight
Edible Arrangements LLC and 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. reached a settlement Friday to end their two-year trademark battle over fruit bouquets.
-
November 13, 2015
Edible Arrangements Can't Ditch Rival's Antitrust Claims
Edible Arrangements lost a bid Thursday to escape accusations in Connecticut federal court that its trademark war against rival 1-800-Flowers.com amounts to a violation of antitrust law.
-
June 08, 2015
Edible Arrangements Says TM Suits Don't Flout Antitrust Law
Edible Arrangements LLC asked a federal judge on Friday to dismiss accusations that the company's trademark war against rival 1-800-Flowers.com Inc. amounts to a violation of antitrust law.
-
March 02, 2015
1-800-Flowers Countersues Edible Arrangements In IP Fight
1-800-Flowers.com Inc. launched an antitrust countersuit against Edible Arrangements LLC in Connecticut federal court on Friday accusing the cut-fruit retailer of anti-competitive conduct by using fraudulently obtained trademark registrations to enforce trademarks for generic terms, in violation of federal law covering fair use.