Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Roger Larsen v. Vizio Inc.
Case Number:
8:14-cv-01865
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Akin Gump
- Baron & Budd
- Chimicles Schwartz
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Gomez Trial Attorneys
- Handley Farah
- Sidley Austin
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 28, 2017
Vizio Beats TV False Ad Suit After Buyer's 'Fatal' Answer
A California federal judge has thrown out a putative class action accusing Vizio Inc. of misrepresenting the refresh rate on its televisions, saying a "fatal" concession by the consumer at deposition showed he wasn't misled.
-
November 09, 2016
Vizio Seeks Quick Win In TV False Ad Suit
Vizio Inc. asked a California federal judge on Tuesday for a quick win in a proposed class action brought by a consumers alleging it falsely markets the refresh rate of its televisions, saying the lead plaintiff based his purchase off an online ad that he admitted was truthful and caused him no harm.