Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

C&C Properties, Inc. et al v. Shell Pipeline Company, et al

  1. June 22, 2023

    Shell Pushes For New Trial On Calif. $41M Pipeline Verdict

    A Shell pipeline unit wants a Golden State federal judge to order a new trial to calculate compensation for trespassing on property owners in eastern California, but the landowners say the oil company is delaying justice and the court should award them more than $30 million.

  2. July 16, 2019

    Shell Wants $34M Calif. Trespassing Verdict Thrown Out

    Shell Pipeline Co. LP told a California federal court that it should not have to face a nearly $34 million jury award in favor of three property owners that claimed Shell's pipelines trespassed on their land, arguing that the owners' legal theory at trial conflicted with the facts.

  3. June 17, 2019

    Jury Says Shell, Alon Owe $40.6M In Pipeline Property Fight

    A California federal jury has awarded three property owners $40.6 million on their claims that pipelines owned by Shell Pipeline Co. and Alon USA Paramount Petroleum Corp. trespassed on their property, while declining to grant punitive damages.

  4. June 14, 2018

    Jury Must Decide If Shell, Alon Breached Easement: Judge

    A California federal judge refused Thursday to grant property owners a win on claims that pipelines owned by Shell Pipeline Co. and Alon USA Paramount Petroleum Corp. interfered with the landowners' use of their property and violated an easement contract, saying a jury should decide the matter.

  5. May 05, 2016

    Shell, Alon Escape Sanctions In Pipeline Easement Suit

    A California federal judge has declined to fine Shell Pipeline Co. and Alon USA Paramount Petroleum Corp. for delays in removing pipelines under a California property, saying that red tape and the nature of the removal held up the project.

  6. April 07, 2016

    Oil Cos. Blasts Bad Faith Claim In Pipeline Easement Suit

    Shell Pipeline Co. and Alon USA Paramount Petroleum Corp. are fighting a developer's allegations that they should be fined for delays in removing a pipeline under a California property, saying that county red tape held up the project, not bad faith.

  7. December 08, 2015

    Shell Ordered To Shift Problematic Calif. Pipeline

    Shell Pipeline Company will have to move a 14-inch underground pipeline landowners claimed interferes with a planned industrial development, a California federal judge ruled Thursday, upholding a U.S. magistrate judge's September recommendation.

  8. September 24, 2015

    Shell Should Shift Problematic Pipeline, Magistrate Says

    A California magistrate judge on Wednesday recommended that the federal court order Shell to relocate or stop using an underground pipeline supposedly interfering with an industrial development, finding the property owner plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.

  9. June 10, 2015

    Chevron Wins Partial Dismissal Of Calif. Pipeline Suit

    A California federal judge dismissed claims against Chevron Pipe Line Co. in a suit alleging a number of pipeline owners are refusing to relocate underground pipelines supposedly interfering with a development, finding that claims related to Chevron's line are pending in arbitration.

  10. April 09, 2015

    Shell Says Opponents Negligent, Injunction Unwarranted

    Shell Pipeline Co. tore into a motion seeking to force the company to relocate a pipeline a developer says hinders work on a roadside property, telling a California federal court Wednesday that Shell shouldn't have to pay for the plaintiffs' own negligence.