Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Cullinane et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:
1:14-cv-14750
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 29, 2020
Mass. Judge OKs $3M Uber Deal After Atty Fee Concerns
A Massachusetts federal judge on Wednesday approved a $3 million settlement between Uber Technologies Inc. and a class of riders claiming they were overcharged, signing off on a $900,000 attorney fee after previously expressing concern over the way fees are tabulated.
-
July 15, 2019
Mass. Judge 'Troubled' By $3M Uber Settlement, $1M Atty Fee
A Massachusetts federal judge on Monday said he was "troubled" by certain aspects of a $3 million settlement between Uber and a class of riders who say they were overcharged for airport rides, asking attorneys connected with the case to spell out why they deserve a nearly $1 million fee.
-
April 29, 2019
Uber, Mass. Riders Ink $3M Deal To End Airport Fee Row
Uber Technologies Inc. will pay $3 million to resolve a putative class action accusing it of overcharging customers for rides to and from Boston's Logan International Airport, according to an initial settlement proposal filed in Massachusetts federal court.
-
June 25, 2018
Uber's 'Barely Visible' Button Isn't Binding, 1st Circ. Says
The First Circuit ruled Monday that Uber Technologies Inc. cannot force a proposed class of riders to arbitrate allegations the ride-hailing service inflated airport fees, finding that a button in its phone application that is "barely visible" until the user enters payment information doesn't give users ample warning of a mandatory arbitration agreement.
-
July 08, 2016
Uber Wins Arbitration In Airport Fee Dispute
A proposed class action from consumers alleging Uber hid extra fees for airport trips was shut down on Friday after a Massachusetts federal judge said court precedent requires the case to go to arbitration, although he suggested concerns over the arbitration agreement.