Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Kanfer v. PharmaCare US, Inc.

Track this case

Case Number:

3:15-cv-00120

Court:

California Southern

Nature of Suit:

Other Fraud

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Jill L. Burkhardt

Firms

  1. October 14, 2016

    Sex Pill Claims Too Vague To Be Misleading, Judge Rules

    A California federal judge handed PharmaCare US Inc. a quick win on Thursday in a proposed class action brought by a consumer alleging the company deceptively advertised its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement, rejecting the theory that the product's label made untrue promises.

  2. October 03, 2016

    Customer Fights To Keep Sex Pill Suit From Being Rejected

    The consumer accusing PharmaCare US Inc. of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement struck back against the company's bid to ax his proposed class action, reassuring a California federal judge on Friday that his claims are just.

  3. September 26, 2016

    Bid To Pause PharmaCare Herbal Sex Pill Suit Comes Up Short

    A California federal judge refused Friday to pause a failed class action accusing PharmaCare US Inc. of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement.

  4. September 19, 2016

    PharmaCare Says No To Stay In Herbal Sex Pill Suit

    PharmaCare US Inc. on Monday told a California federal judge it can't temporarily pause a failed class action accusing it of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement, saying the plaintiff hasn't backed up his request with any explanation of why a stay is warranted.

  5. September 16, 2016

    PharmaCare Stiffly Opposes Customer's Sex Pill Suit

    PharmaCare US Inc. on Thursday asked a California federal court to dismiss a failed class action accusing it of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement, as the court recently dismissed a case based on the same allegations for being too vague and general.

  6. June 10, 2016

    Sex Pill Buyers Denied Cert. Under Spokeo In False Ad Row

    A California federal judge on Friday denied a bid for class certification in a suit accusing PharmaCare US Inc. of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement, saying the buyers lacked standing under the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Spokeo ruling, among other deficiencies.

  7. May 10, 2016

    Sex Supplement Buyer Pushes For Cert. In False Ad Suit

    Months after a California federal judge declined to dismiss a proposed class action accusing PharmaCare US Inc. of deceptively advertising its IntenseX herbal sexual supplement, the man leading the lawsuit said Monday his claims are common enough for class certification.

  8. November 05, 2015

    Sex Supplement Suit Not Barred By Federal Law, Judge Says

    By touting its herbal, sexual supplement IntenseX as an impotence cure, PharmaCare US Inc. has strayed from the safety of federal preemption, according to a California federal judge who refused to dismiss a proposed class action against the company Wednesday.

  9. January 21, 2015

    IntenseX Falsely Touted As Sex-Enhancing Pill, Suit Says

    Dietary supplement maker PharmaCare US Inc. falsely advertised its IntenseX herbal supplement as improving sexual performance and promoted the product as an aphrodisiac without U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval, according to a putative class action filed in California federal court Tuesday.