Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Sabatino v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:15-cv-00363
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 20, 2016
Uber Settles Suit Over Driver Background Checks
Uber Technologies Inc. has settled a proposed class action accusing the ride-hailing company of misleading consumers over how it screens its drivers, according to court documents filed in California federal court Wednesday.
-
January 28, 2015
Class Action Accuses Uber Of Lying About Safety Checks
Uber Technologies Inc. was hit with a consumer class action alleging that it lies to riders about the safety checks it conducts on its drivers and their cars, the plaintiff said Wednesday, a little more than a month after district attorneys in Los Angeles and San Francisco raised similar claims.