Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Miadeco Corp. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-20356
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 30, 2017
Fla. Judge Trims Taxi Cos.' Uber, Lyft Monopoly Suit
A Florida federal judge on Thursday trimmed an amended proposed class action from taxicab license holders alleging Uber and Lyft deceived consumers by misrepresenting their ride-hailing services as safe and compliant with local regulations, but gave the cabbies another chance to bolster some of their antitrust claims.
-
November 03, 2016
Uber Says Taxis Just Clinging To Monopoly With Fla. Suit
Uber and Lyft told a Florida federal court Tuesday that taxicab license holders still have proven no injuries and are merely fighting to retain their long-held monopoly with class allegations that the ride-hailing companies deceived consumers about their services' safety and compliance with local regulations.
-
October 05, 2016
Fla. Taxi Cos. Slam Uber, Lyft's Bid To Duck Unfair Regs Suit
Florida taxicab drivers slammed Uber's and Lyft's bid to toss a proposed class action alleging they deceived consumers by misrepresenting their ride-hailing services as safe and compliant with local regulations, arguing Tuesday the suit's unfair competition claims are sound and well-reasoned.
-
August 02, 2016
Uber, Lyft Say Taxis Sued To Hang On To Monopoly
Uber and Lyft asked a Florida federal court Monday to toss a proposed class action from taxicab drivers alleging the companies deceived consumers by misrepresenting the ride-hailing services as safe and compliant with local regulations, saying the suit is a ploy by taxi operators to retain their long-held monopoly.