Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
UUSI, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-00146
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Foster Swift
- Fraser Trebilcock
- Glaser Weil
- McKool Smith
- Smith Haughey
- Varnum LLP
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 17, 2025
Samsung Wins Dismissal Of Touch Screen Patent Suit
A Michigan federal judge has tossed a lawsuit claiming certain Samsung tablets infringe a touch screen patent, finding that the company that brought the lawsuit didn't have any interest in the patent at the time the case was launched.
-
June 18, 2019
Fed. Circ. Revives Samsung Bid To Ax Touchscreen Patent
The Federal Circuit on Tuesday gave Samsung a new chance to persuade the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to invalidate a UUSI LLC touchscreen patent it is accused of infringing, saying the board's decision that Samsung didn't prove invalidity was not supported by evidence.
-
October 19, 2017
Samsung Loses Bid To Beat Touchscreen Patent at PTAB
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Wednesday refused to find certain claims in a government contractor's touchscreen technology were unpatentable as obvious, ruling against Samsung Electronics Co.'s bid to undermine an infringement suit it faces over Galaxy products in Michigan federal court.