Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Walgreen Co. et al v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:15-cv-01032
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Companies
- Allergan PLC
- Endo International PLC
- Safeway Inc.
- Teikoku Pharma USA Inc.
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
- The Kroger Co.
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 11, 2015
Endo Slams Walgreens' Lidoderm Pay-For-Delay Suit
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. asked a California federal court Friday to ax Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and Kroger Co.'s lawsuit, saying because they didn't buy the pain patch directly from the drugmaker, they couldn't challenge its Lidoderm patent settlements.
-
March 05, 2015
Walgreens, Safeway Want To Join Lidoderm MDL
Walgreens Co., The Kroger Co. and other grocery stores sought to enter the Lidoderm pay-for-delay multidistrict litigation in California federal court, accusing Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Teikoku Seiyaku Co. Ltd. of paying at least $266 million to delay generic versions of the pain patch.