Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
Case Number:
3:15-cv-01257
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 20, 2015
Taxi Cab Cos.' Uber False Ad Suit Survives Dismissal Bid
A California federal judge on Friday trimmed but left standing a suit by taxi companies that say Uber Technologies Inc. falsely advertises its service as safer than traditional cabs, saying that although some of Uber's statements were puffery or protected speech, others were fair game.
-
March 18, 2015
Taxi Cab Cos. Smack Uber With False Ad Suit In Calif.
A coalition of 19 taxi companies on Wednesday sued Uber Technologies Inc. in California federal court, claiming it is violating the Lanham Act by falsely advertising that Uber has the "safest rides on the road," even though cab drivers are more rigorously screened.