Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Fernandez et al v. UBS AG et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-02859
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ballard Spahr
- Bernstein Litowitz
- Bobonis Bobonis
- Certain & Zilberg
- Freed Kanner
- Grant & Eisenhofer
- Kessler Topaz
- O’Neill & Borges
- Pietrantoni Mendez
- Skadden Arps
- Stroock & Stroock
- Sullivan & Cromwell
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 26, 2018
Investors, UBS Agree To Arbitrate Mutual Fund Risk Suit
Investors and UBS have agreed to arbitrate a suit over whether the Swiss bank and its subsidiaries broke agreements linked to closed-end mutual funds by not properly structuring the investments in light of their exposure to Puerto Rican debt.
-
September 18, 2018
UBS Investors Denied Cert. In Mutual Funds Dispute
A New York federal judge on Monday declined to certify a class of investors alleging UBS and its subsidiaries violated agreements to analyze the suitability of their investments in closed‐end mutual funds, saying the appropriateness of certain investments will vary by individual.
-
December 07, 2016
UBS, Banco Popular Unit See $5M Investor Suit Pared
A Manhattan federal judge on Wednesday largely pared a $5 million proposed class action alleging that UBS AG and a Banco Popular subsidiary steered older investors into risky and volatile mutual funds, finding many claims to be time-barred.
-
October 14, 2016
UBS Wants To Toss Investors' Breach Of Duty Class Action
UBS AG and a Banco Popular subsidiary asked a New York federal judge Friday to toss a $5 million putative class action that alleges they steered older investors into risky and volatile mutual funds, contending the state law claims of breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty are rooted in fraud.