Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
STATE OF ALABAMA v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-00696
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Administrative Procedure Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Firms
- ArentFox Schiff
- Balch & Bingham
- Capell & Howard
- Davison Van Cleve
- Jones Fortuna
- Kazmarek Mowrey
- King & Spalding
- Lanier Ford
- Lightfoot Franklin
- Maynard Nexsen
- Sasser Sefton
- Sidley Austin
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 01, 2025
Ga., Army Corps Beat Ala. Challenge To Water Use Plan
A D.C. federal judge ruled that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers did not need congressional approval to increase Georgia's water allocations from a metro Atlanta lake, handing a win to the Army Corps and the Peach State in a decadelong fight with the state of Alabama.
-
July 21, 2016
DC Judge Skeptical Army Corps Dam Row Needs To Be Moved
A D.C. federal court Thursday all but rejected the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' request to transfer the state of Alabama's lawsuit over a metro Atlanta area dam to similar proceedings in Georgia, repeatedly downplaying the Corps' fears of inconsistent orders from the two courts.