Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Cardionet, LLC et al v. Infobionic, Inc.
Case Number:
1:15-cv-11803
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
December 22, 2021
Judge Told CardioNet Owes $2.9M In Fees For 'Misconduct'
InfoBionic Inc. has told a Massachusetts federal judge that conduct by Philips unit CardioNet LLC during a heart monitor patent dispute was so exceptional that InfoBionic should get nearly $2.9 million in attorney fees, expenses and witness fees.
-
July 01, 2020
Fed. Circ., Judge Nix CardioNet Heart Monitor Patent Claims
CardioNet's heart monitor patent cases against two different companies were dealt blows Wednesday by both the Federal Circuit, which invalidated three of the patents under Alice, and a Massachusetts federal judge, who axed infringement allegations on another patent for being filed too late.
-
April 05, 2018
CardioNet's Heart Monitor Patents Get Trimmed Under Alice
A Massachusetts federal judge has hacked away at two of CardioNet LLC's patents for identifying and treating heart arrhythmias, finding that claims she already invalidated under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling are representative of other claims at issue in the litigation.