Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Skokomish Indian Tribe v. Gold Coast Oyster LLC et al
Case Number:
2:89-sp-00312
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Government Agencies
-
March 03, 2017
Tideland Owners Can't Duck Fishing Plan Dispute With Tribe
A Washington federal judge on Thursday shot down a tideland owner's bid for a quick win in a dispute with the Skokomish Indian Tribe over a fishing plan, saying evidence indicates the tribe has yet to receive its share of a shellfish harvest despite exercising its treaty rights.
-
May 11, 2015
Wash. Tribe Says Co. Impeding Shellfish Harvest Rights
The Skokomish Indian Tribe said Friday that it has tried and failed to negotiate an end to a shellfish conflict in the Hood Canal with a family-owned shellfish harvesting company, urging a Washington federal judge to act over allegedly unlawful interference in its harvest rights.