Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Albert et al v. Blue Diamond Growers et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-04087
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Davis & Gilbert
- DLA Piper
- Hanson Bridgett
- Lewis Brisbois
- Pollack Solomon
- Sullivan & Worcester
- Wolf Popper
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 08, 2016
Almond Milk Buyers Fight Stay Pending Other False Ad Deal
Blue Diamond Growers is mistaken to assert that a settlement of "all natural" false labeling claims regarding its Almond Breeze milk products will end separate litigation claiming it skimped on almonds, consumers in the latter suit told a New York judge Wednesday, blasting the company's bid for a pause.
-
October 21, 2015
Almond Milk Makers Duck Drinkers' Bid For Label Change
A New York federal judge on Wednesday refused to order Blue Diamond Growers and the maker of Silk Almond Milk to remove all references to almonds on their labels, holding that consumers claiming the products don't contain enough almonds aren't at risk for future harm.
-
July 23, 2015
Blue Diamond Fights Injunction Over Almond Content Claims
Blue Diamond Growers told a New York federal judge Thursday that the plaintiffs accusing the company of overstating the almond content in its Almond Breeze milk have no standing for an injunction because they've made it clear they won't purchase the products in the future.
-
July 14, 2015
Almond Milk Maker Exaggerates Nut Content, Suit Says
Blue Diamond Growers was hit with a putative class action Tuesday in a New York federal court alleging it purposely misrepresents its almond milk products as being made primarily from almonds, when in fact the products contain only 2 percent of the nut.