Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Hart et al v. BHH LLC et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-04804
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
January 21, 2020
Atty Pay Provision Trips Bell & Howell Pest Repeller Deal
A New York federal judge has rejected a proposed settlement meant to end class litigation over allegedly defective pest repellers made by Bell & Howell, saying the attorneys should not get paid before the product buyers do.
-
September 04, 2019
Bell & Howell To Refund Buyers Of Ultrasonic Mouse Repellers
Bell & Howell will offer cash refunds to people who bought allegedly defective ultrasonic pest repellers, according to a settlement announced to end a class action in New York federal court claiming the company misled buyers on the repellers' ability to keep mice away.
-
April 11, 2019
Mice Slept On And 'High-Fived' Rodent Repeller, Buyers Say
Buyers of Bell & Howell's "Ultrasonic Pest Repellers" who claim the company fooled them into buying a defective product said ahead of trial in New York federal court that testing footage recently disclosed by the company shows mice sleeping on and, in one instance, appearing to "high-five" one such device.
-
April 01, 2019
Expert To Tell Jury Mouse Repellers Cost Consumers $55M
A Manhattan federal judge cleared the way Monday for a damages expert to tell a jury that allegedly bogus mouse repellers billed as effective by defendant Bell & Howell cost jilted consumers across the country $55 million.
-
September 05, 2018
Bell & Howell Can't Nix Pest Repeller False Ad Suit
A New York federal judge on Wednesday refused to dismiss a putative class action claiming Bell & Howell sold an ultrasonic pest repeller that failed to work as advertised, noting the plaintiffs' evidence included a picture of a mouse apparently resting on top of an active repeller.