Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Jose Jacobo v. Ross Stores, Inc., et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-04701
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 01, 2018
Ross Shoppers Bag $4.85M Deal With Store Over Price Tags
Consumers have urged a California federal court to approve a $4.85 million settlement ending claims that Ross Stores Inc. duped customers into believing they were paying less for items by including the phrase "comparable at" on their price tags.
-
August 03, 2017
Ross Patrons Don't Show Harm From Price Tags, Judge Says
A California federal judge Wednesday dismissed a proposed class action against Ross Stores Inc. that accused the company of using misleading price tags, ruling that the shoppers hadn't shown that they suffered harm.
-
June 07, 2017
Ross Shoppers Defend Suit Over 'Compare At' Price Tags
Shoppers suing Ross Stores over allegedly misleading comparison price tags have hit back at the retailer's push for a quick win in their proposed class action, telling a California federal judge that evidence shows the discount department stores violated consumer protection laws.
-
May 30, 2017
Ross Customers Seek Cert. In 'Compare At' Tag Suit
A group of customers accusing Ross Stores of misleading shoppers with its comparison prices have made a bid for class certification in California federal court, saying that despite the retailer's claims otherwise, the alleged price-tag lies' impact was uniform, even if each comparison was different.
-
March 22, 2017
Ross Stores' 'Unusual' Cert. Killer Faces Skeptical Judge
A California federal judge on Wednesday tentatively denied Ross Stores' preemptive request for an order denying class certification in litigation alleging the retailer misleads shoppers with inflated comparison prices, calling it an "unusual motion" that would be unfair to grant before discovery is complete.
-
June 13, 2016
Ross Can't Toss Class Action Over Misleading Price Tags
A California federal judge on Monday tentatively rejected Ross Stores Inc.'s bid to escape a putative class action alleging the retailer misleads shoppers with inflated comparison prices tagged on purportedly discount merchandise, finding the allegations in the complaint included sufficient details for the case to go forward.