Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Christine Asia Co. Ltd. et al v. Ma et al

  1. October 17, 2019

    Rosen Law Gets $62.5M Award As Alibaba Deal Gets Final OK

    A New York federal judge granted final approval Wednesday to a $250 million settlement that resolves securities claims against Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and provides class counsel, The Rosen Law Firm PA, with $62.5 million in fees.

  2. September 12, 2019

    Attys Push For $63M Fee Award In Alibaba Stock-Drop Suit

    Attorneys who secured a tentative $250 million from Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. to resolve investors' allegations that it failed to disclose regulatory scrutiny ahead of a $25 billion initial public offering asked a New York federal court Wednesday for $62.5 million in fees.

  3. April 29, 2019

    Alibaba Strikes $250M Deal Ending Stock-Drop Suit

    Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. agreed Monday in New York federal court to pay $250 million to resolve investors' lawsuit over a stock drop they say was caused by the company's failure to disclose regulatory scrutiny ahead of its $25 billion initial public offering.

  4. November 06, 2018

    Alibaba Must Show Judge IPO Docs In Stock-Drop Suit

    Alibaba will have to show a New York federal judge nearly a dozen documents it listed on a privilege log in a securities suit over its $25 billion initial public offering, according to a Tuesday order in an ongoing fight over whether the documents should be kept secret.

  5. October 31, 2018

    Investors Seek IPO Docs In Alibaba Stock-Drop Suit

    Investors suing China's Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. over its $25 billion initial public offering urged a New York federal court Tuesday to require the production of certain documents, saying the e-commerce giant can't assert privilege by simply editing the document descriptions to pertain to U.S. rather than Chinese matters.

  6. June 22, 2016

    Alibaba Wins Dismissal Of Pre-IPO Disclosure Suits

    Alibaba's failure to mention an "informal meeting" with Chinese regulators in its $25 billion initial public offering is not a material omission, according to a New York judge who on Tuesday dismissed a proposed securities class action against the e-commerce giant.