Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Center for Environmental Health et al v. McCarthy et al
Case Number:
3:15-cv-02939
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Judge:
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 30, 2016
EPA Needn't Mandate Pesticide Disclosure, Calif. Judge Says
A California federal judge held Wednesday that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency didn't act arbitrarily by effectively denying a petition to force certain inert ingredients to be listed on pesticides, concluding that the agency is allowed to impose such a requirement but isn't obligated to do so.
-
March 21, 2016
EPA Tells Court It Needn't Mandate Pesticide Disclosure
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Friday sought out of a California federal lawsuit accusing it of illegally denying a petition to force certain inert ingredients to be listed on pesticides, arguing it is not required under the law to impose that requirement.