Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
IPS Group, Inc. v. Duncan Solutions, Inc.
Case Number:
3:15-cv-01526
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
August 20, 2018
Sparse Detail Gets Parking Meter Co. $100K Of $1.4M Fee Bid
A California federal judge has slammed a Milwaukee-based parking meter company for not providing enough detail in its request for $1.4 million in attorneys' and expert fees, awarding the meter company just $100,000 for legal expenses it incurred defending itself against patent infringement claims levied by a San Diego-based telecommunications company.
-
June 20, 2018
Tech Co. Slams Meter Maker's $1.4M Fees Ask In Patent Row
A San Diego-based telecommunications company Tuesday fired back in California federal court at a parking meter maker's request for $1.4 million in attorneys' fees over patent infringement allegations found to be objectively baseless, saying the meter company has failed to adequately support its request.
-
June 05, 2018
Parking Meter Maker Seeks $1.4M In Atty Fees After IP Win
A Milwaukee-based parking meter maker asked a California federal judge on Monday to award it $1.42 million in attorneys' fees after the judge found that some of a telecommunications equipment company's patent infringement allegations were objectively baseless and unreasonable.
-
October 17, 2017
Judge Won't DQ Mintz Levin In Parking Meter IP Dispute
A California federal judge declined Tuesday to disqualify Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC from representing an electronic parts supplier in a patent suit brought by telecommunications supplier IPS Group, finding the firm had not represented it recently enough to merit disqualification.
-
August 23, 2017
Parts Co. Fights Mintz Levin DQ In Parking Meter IP Dispute
A Milwaukee-based electronic parts supplier has hit back against an attempt by telecommunications equipment company IPS Group to disqualify Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC as its attorneys in a patent suit brought by IPS, telling a California federal court that the firm had done "limited, sporadic work" for IPS but hadn't represented it in years.
-
August 17, 2017
Parts Supplier Ducks Claims It Infringed Parking Meter IP
A Milwaukee-based electronic parts supplier on Wednesday ducked allegations in California federal court that it infringed the asserted claims of a patent covering a parking meter held by telecommunications equipment company IPS Group Inc.
-
August 01, 2017
Telecom Co. Seeks Mintz Levin DQ In Patent Dispute
Telecommunications equipment company IPS Group on Monday asked a California federal judge to disqualify Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky & Popeo PC as opposing counsel in a suit accusing a Milwaukee-based electronic parts supplier of infringing a parking meter patent, saying that the firm is familiar with the company's confidential information.