Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
P.F. Chang's China Bistro Incorporated v. Federal Insurance Company
Case Number:
2:15-cv-01322
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 08, 2016
P.F. Chang's Objects To Atty Fees In Data Breach Suit
P.F. Chang's China Bistro Inc. asked a federal judge not to award around $246,000 in attorney fees to its insurance company after the court decided that the restaurant chain wasn't covered under a cyberinsurance policy for nearly $2 million of assessments charged to its card processing agent following a large-scale data breach.
-
June 27, 2016
PF Chang's Appeals Data Breach Coverage Loss To 9th Circ.
P.F. Chang's has indicated it will appeal to the Ninth Circuit an Arizona federal court's decision that it isn't covered under a cyberinsurance policy for assessments MasterCard charged its card processing agent following a large-scale data breach, according to court documents filed Monday.
-
June 06, 2016
PF Chang's Can't Get More Coverage For Data Breach Fees
A federal judge has granted a motion for summary judgment against P.F. Chang's in its suit against its insurer, Chubb unit Federal Insurance Co., over assessments that MasterCard charged P.F. Chang's card processing agent following a large data breach, saying the insurance policy unequivocally excludes coverage for such charges.