Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Boelter v. Advance Magazine Publishers, Inc.
Case Number:
1:15-cv-05671
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
August 21, 2018
Conde Nast Privacy Suit Ends With $13.8M Settlement
Conde Nast has reached a $13.75 million settlement with a class of consumers who claim the company violated a Michigan privacy law by selling customer data without their consent, according to New York federal court filings Tuesday.
-
November 23, 2016
Condé Nast Can't Appeal To Get Privacy Suit Nixed
A New York federal judge on Tuesday said Condé Nast can't appeal to the Second Circuit to escape a lawsuit from a proposed class of consumers accusing the media company of selling customer data without consent because privacy laws don’t apply retroactively.
-
September 29, 2016
Conde Nast Can't Unsubscribe From Privacy Suit
A New York federal judge on Wednesday shut down Conde Nast's bid to escape a proposed class action accusing the media company of selling customer data without consent, saying the alleged intrusion of privacy suffices as a concrete, if difficult to pin down, injury.
-
August 18, 2016
8th Circ. Ruling Doesn't Help Subscriber Row: Conde Nast
Conde Nast blasted a subscriber's latest attempt to save class claims that the media company sold customer data without consent, telling a New York federal court Thursday that a recent Eighth Circuit decision the subscriber has cited involves a case that is far too different to be applicable.
-
July 28, 2016
Condé Nast Slams Subscriber's Bid To Save Data Sales Suit
Condé Nast clapped back Wednesday at a bid to keep alive class allegations that the media company sold customer data without consent, telling a New York federal judge the consumers' reliance on a ruling on entirely different claims has no bearing on this case.
-
July 26, 2016
Consumers Won't Let Conde Nast Off The Hook For Data Sales
Conde Nast can't escape a proposed class action accusing the media company of selling customer data without consent because a judge in a separate suit has said a state statute violation is enough to make a case, a New York federal court heard Tuesday.
-
July 06, 2016
Conde Nast Says 3rd Circ. Ruling Can't Save Subscriber Suit
Conde Nast told a New York federal judge Wednesday that a subscriber accusing the company of selling customer data without consent is wrongly relying on a Third Circuit decision in trying to save the litigation, saying the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Spokeo ruling makes it clear that she lacks standing.
-
July 01, 2016
Viacom Ruling Means Conde Nast Can't Nix Suit: Consumers
Conde Nast can't escape a proposed class action accusing the media company of selling customer data without consent now that the Third Circuit has refused to establish what constitutes personally identifiable information under the Video Protection Privacy Act in a similar case, a New York federal judge heard Friday.
-
June 20, 2016
Hearst Ruling Means Conde Nast Can't Nix Suit: Consumers
Conde Nast must face allegations brought by a proposed class of subscribers who say it sold customer data without consent now that a judge has declined to toss a separate but similar case against Hearst Communications, a New York federal judge heard Friday.
-
May 19, 2016
Conde Nast Says Subscribers Have It Backwards On Spokeo
Conde Nast told a New York federal judge Wednesday that a proposed class of subscribers misunderstood the U.S. Supreme Court's recent Spokeo decision when they said it bolsters their standing to sue the magazine giant for disseminating subscriber information, saying the high court ruling actually backs dismissal.