Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
City of Spokane v. Monsanto Company et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-00201
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Baron & Budd
- Capes Sokol
- Gomez Trial Attorneys
- Kutak Rock
- Latham & Watkins
- Lee & Hayes
- Shook Hardy
- Witherspoon Brajcich
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 14, 2017
Monsanto Counterclaims Against Spokane Uprooted By Judge
A Washington state federal judge on Tuesday tossed counterclaims brought by Monsanto Co. against the city of Spokane, Washington, in a suit from the city claiming the company should have to pay for cleanup costs associated with pollution in the Spokane River, saying the company failed to state a claim under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act.
-
October 27, 2016
Monsanto Can't Escape Spokane River Contamination Suit
A U.S. district judge Wednesday largely upheld a suit from a city in the state of Washington claiming that Monsanto Co. should have to pay for cleanup costs associated with pollution in the Spokane River, finding the city can't bring one of its products liability claims because it isn't a consumer.