Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Campfield et al v. Safelite Group, Inc. et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-02733
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
March 28, 2019
Windshield Repair Co. Safelite Partially Escapes False Ad Suit
An Ohio federal court judge Thursday partially dismissed a lawsuit in which windshield replacement giant Safelite is accused by a competitor of wrongly perpetuating as fact its assertion any windshield crack larger than 6 inches requires complete replacement to be safely repaired.
-
March 26, 2018
Windshield Repair Co. Defends False Ad Suit Against Safelite
A rival accusing Safelite Group Inc. of hurting its windshield repair business by allegedly promoting the false idea that glass cracks longer than six inches require full windshield replacement told an Ohio federal judge Friday that it isn't trying to make an end-run around him with its latest complaint.
-
February 09, 2018
Safelite Windshield Repair Co. Looks To Exit False Ad Suit
Vehicle glass repair company Safelite Group Inc. asked an Ohio federal court Thursday to toss a suit by a rival alleging Safelite's advertisements falsely push the notion that windshield cracks of a certain size require full replacement, arguing the "dollar bill rule" it follows is a widely accepted industry standard.
-
August 19, 2015
Safelite Rival Says False Ads Wrecking Its Glass Repair Biz
Safelite Group Inc. was hit Tuesday with a false advertising lawsuit in Ohio federal court by a manufacturer of professional windshield repair products that claims Safelite's advertisements falsely push the notion that windshield cracks of a certain size require full replacement when simply repairing a crack is allegedly more effective.