IN RE NAMENDA INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION

  1. March 24, 2023

    Attys Get $18.8M In Allergan, Merz 'Pay-For-Delay' Settlement

    Plaintiffs counsel in a class action from consumers who alleged Allergan and Merz delayed generic versions of Alzheimer's drugs from coming to market will be awarded 33.3%, plus litigation expense reimbursement, of an eight-figure settlement.

  2. November 14, 2022

    Allergan, Merz's $54.4M Nameda Pay-For-Delay Deal Wins OK

    A New York federal judge on Monday granted preliminary approval to consumers' $54.4 million settlement with pharmaceutical companies Allergan and Merz over alleged pay-for-delay deals that kept generic versions of the Alzheimer's disease drug Namenda off the market, an agreement reached on the eve of trial.

  3. June 11, 2021

    Allergan Unit Must Face Bulk Of Namenda Pay-For-Delay Suit

    Allergan subsidiary Forest Laboratories LLC must face a jury over a union health and welfare fund's class action antitrust claims that pay-for-delay deals kept generic versions of Alzheimer's drug Namenda off the market after a New York federal judge largely rejected the parties' competing bids for a quick win Friday.

  4. September 01, 2020

    Dr. Reddy's Inks Deal To Exit Namenda Pay-For-Delay Suit

    Drug buyers asked a New York federal court on Monday to approve their deal with generic-drug maker Dr. Reddy's Laboratories to settle class allegations accusing the company of conspiring with other pharma firms to keep a generic version of the brand name Alzheimer's drug Namenda off the market.

  5. July 21, 2020

    Namenda Buyers Want Cert. In Pay-For-Delay Fight

    Drug buyers who claim that a slew of pharmaceutical companies conspired to keep a generic version of the brand name Alzheimer's drug Namenda off the market are asking a New York federal court to sign off on their class action.

  6. August 19, 2019

    4 Drug Cos. Strike $1.5M Deal In Namenda Pay-For-Delay Suit

    Four generic-drug makers have agreed to pay a combined $1.54 million to settle allegations that they struck anticompetitive deals with an Actavis unit to keep a generic version of the Alzheimer's drug Namenda off the market.

  7. December 23, 2015

    Actavis Says Namenda Product-Hopping Suit Has No Hop

    Pharmaceutical companies Actavis and Merz told a New York federal court Tuesday they cannot be sued for "product hopping" the Alzheimer's treatment Namenda, because the drug's original version was never pulled off the market and a generic has since been released.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!