Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Evanston Insurance Company v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:
3:15-cv-03988
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 16, 2016
Uber, Insurer Reach Settlement In Fatal Crash Coverage Row
Uber and Evanston Insurance Co. have reached a deal in principle in litigation claiming the insurer isn't responsible for covering a settlement over a fatal collision, which spawned counterclaims challenging the insurer's refusal to cover that matter and another accident-related action, according to a Thursday filing in California federal court.
-
December 14, 2015
Uber's Counterclaims Survive In Fight With Excess Insurer
A California federal judge on Monday denied Evanston Insurance Co.'s attempt to shed breach of contract counterclaims by Uber after refusing to defend the technology giant in two suits stemming from car accidents, saying the insurer misinterprets the structure of its excess insurance coverage.
-
September 01, 2015
Uber Can't Get Coverage For Fatal Crash, Excess Insurer Says
Evanston Insurance Co. sued Uber Technologies Inc. on Tuesday seeking a declaratory judgment that it isn't required to cover Uber's settlement with the family of a 6-year-old girl killed in a collision with an alleged Uber driver, saying its excess policy covers technology, not taxi operations.