Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Tree Top Inc v. Starr Indemnity and Liability Company
Case Number:
1:15-cv-03155
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 21, 2017
Juice Maker Didn't Face 'Claim' Until Labeling Suit: Judge
A Washington federal judge on Tuesday found a juice maker had given its insurer sufficient notice to be covered for a labeling suit, saying the initial statutory notice the company received was not a claim.
-
September 20, 2017
Starr Says Juice Maker Should Have Disclosed Presuit Notice
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co. told a Washington federal judge Tuesday that a notice of a possible suit under California's Proposition 65 labeling law created a claim that a fruit juice maker should have told the insurer about when it applied for a policy, while the juice maker urged the court to find the claim didn't arise until the suit was filed.