Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Cody et al. v. ConforMIS, Inc. et al
Case Number:
1:15-cv-13295
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 03, 2016
Judge Tosses Investors' Suit Over $140M ConforMIS IPO
In a tartly worded opinion, a Massachusetts judge ruled Wednesday that "lack of clairvoyance is not actionable" in tossing a proposed class action that claimed artificial joint maker ConforMIS Inc. misled investors about manufacturing issues ahead of its $140 million initial public offering.
-
April 18, 2016
ConforMIS Investors Fight Bid To Toss Suit Over $140M IPO
A proposed class of investors in ConforMIS Inc. asked a Massachusetts federal court Friday not to toss their suit claiming the artificial joint maker misled investors about manufacturing issues ahead of its $140 million initial public offering in July, saying a prospectus glossed over clear quality control deficiencies that led to a costly recall.
-
March 21, 2016
ConforMIS Moves To Toss Suit Over $140M IPO
Artificial joint maker ConforMIS Inc. urged a Massachusetts federal court on Friday to dismiss a putative investor class action accusing the company of hiding problems with its knee joint replacement systems in advance of its $140 million initial public offering.
-
November 12, 2015
Pomerantz Named Lead Counsel In $121M ConforMIS IPO Suit
A Massachusetts federal judge on Tuesday approved Pomerantz LLP as lead counsel and Block & Leviton LLP as liaison counsel for a putative investor class accusing artificial-joint maker ConforMIS Inc. of hiding problems with its knee joint replacement systems ahead of its $121 million initial public offering.
-
September 04, 2015
Artificial Joint Co. Hid Issues Before $121M IPO, Suit Claims
Private equity-backed artificial joint maker ConforMIS Inc. hid problems with its knee joint replacement systems in advance of its $121 million initial public offering, failing to disclose the manufacturing defect until it issued a recall months later, shareholders have claimed in a proposed class action.