Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
R&Q Reinsurance Company v. St. Paul Fire And Marine Insurance Company
-
March 30, 2016
Travelers Unit Gets Asbestos Insurance Row Sent To Pa.
An Illinois federal judge on Wednesday agreed to send R&Q Reinsurance's suit against a Travelers subsidiary over $8 million in asbestos claim payouts to Pennsylvania, agreeing with Travelers that the suit had little connection to Illinois.
-
December 16, 2015
Travelers Unit Accuses R&Q Of 'Blatant Forum Shopping'
A Travelers subsidiary on Wednesday accused R&Q Reinsurance of "blatant forum shopping" for bringing a suit over $8 million in asbestos claim payouts in Illinois, and urged a federal judge to move the suit to Pennsylvania.
-
November 24, 2015
R&Q Fights Transfer Of $8M Asbestos Reinsurance Dispute
R&Q Reinsurance urged an Illinois federal court Tuesday to deny a Travelers subsidiary's bid to transfer to Pennsylvania a dispute over whether R&Q must pay the insurer more than $8 million on asbestos claim payouts, pointing out that the parties' reinsurance agreement was executed in Chicago.
-
October 08, 2015
Travelers Unit Sues Reinsurer For $8M In Asbestos Coverage
A Travelers subsidiary sued R&Q Reinsurance in Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday, claiming it owes the insurer more than $8 million on asbestos claim payouts under two 1980s policies the reinsurer agreed to cover in part.